Despite securing 49.8% of the vote, the Republican approval is far from resounding. Furthermore, we find ourselves with an unelected co-president, derisively dubbed "Hitler Musk," who appears to have bought his way into power.

His approach to international diplomacy bears an unsettling resemblance to Putin’s tactics, as he imposes his eccentric business vision on pivotal global issues. In this light, Trump comes across not as a leader but as a mere puppet for Putin’s ambitions.

Consider Trump's strange fixation on Greenland, which seems more aligned with Putin's interests than any genuine initiative from his administration or the Heritage Foundation. Denmark has repeatedly asserted that the U.S. is free to operate in Greenland without restrictions, a situation upheld for 80 years.

Only someone like Putin could demand more from Denmark. Trump's belligerent threats against Greenland have led to international mockery, prompting genuine concern among our NATO allies.

The renaming of the Gulf of Mexico is an incredibly odd detail, and the renaming of Denali has cost him support from Republican Native American voters and governorships. Additionally, his criticism of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives will likely undermine the progress Republicans have made with minority voters.

Meanwhile, Greenland's politicians are working to distance the country from the United States and focus on strengthening cooperation with nations that recognize its quest for independence and respect.

J.D. Vance's family was shocked by the unfolding crisis in Ukraine. His cousin, Nate Vance, who fought valiantly for Ukraine, could have lost trust in him. Nate publicly condemned J.D. Vance's actions, calling them an outright "ambush" against Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

When Nate heard U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance criticize Zelenskyy during a speech in the Oval Office, he felt deep anger and disappointment. He expressed his strong feelings in a candid interview with *Le Figaro*.

"Being a family member does not exempt you from responsibility for endangering my comrades," Nate explained, clarifying his profound disappointment. He did not hold back in his criticism, calling out both J.D. Vance and former President Donald Trump for their decision to suspend military aid to Ukraine as "Putin's useful idiots."

Now 47 years old, Nate returned to the United States in January 2025 after a challenging three-year deployment in Ukraine, during which he spent over two years on the front lines. He expressed his views by saying, "Initially, I thought my cousin's criticism of support for Ukraine was merely a political maneuver to appease a specific base. However, what J.D. Vance and Trump have done to Zelensky represents a betrayal of the highest order—an ambush characterized by bad faith."

This powerful statement highlights Nate's deep disappointment in his cousin's actions. It raises the question of how many loyal Republican voters share this sentiment. Have they lost their trust? Rather than speculate about Trump's future actions, we need to take action now. One effective approach is to undermine both the pro-Russian American billionaires and the Russian oligarchs. Money is always a vulnerable point, and we can boycott them to make a difference.

Boycotts are powerful tools for driving change, as seen in the Canadian government's decisive move to ban crucial American products. With its 2,400 stores, retail giants like Loblaw are taking a stand by labeling their offerings, encouraging consumers to support Canadian businesses over American imports to bolster Ukrainians in their fight.

Tesla is currently facing a global boycott, which will result in a substantial drop in Elon Musk's wealth. Given Tesla's ties to Russian investors and oligarchs, excluding the company from Western markets seems more sensible than ever.

A boycott of these pro-Russian vehicles is not only justified but necessary. Trump's recent maneuvers appear to be aimed at propping up Musk, especially as Tesla grapples with significant challenges, which he blames on left-wing radicals. However, it's crucial to recognize that both Musk and Trump can be categorized as right-wing radicals themselves.

Many consumers are contemplating boycotting Tesla, with some choosing to keep their cars parked out of embarrassment for supporting Musk. Republicans who truly oppose pro-Russian interests need to take a stand and vote against Trump in Congress.

There have been troubling instances of vandalism at golf clubs tied to Trump, revealing a rising tide of anger toward him. While we do not condone such actions, we firmly advocate for economic pressure on pro-Russian enterprises. Our goal is to boycott these billionaires until their influence is significantly diminished.

Furthermore, businesses leasing space from the Trump Organization should also face boycotts. Trump's endorsement of Putin is unacceptable; we cannot allow support for terrorists and mass murderers to stand.

Many Republicans are rightly ashamed of Trump's actions, with some feeling compelled to avoid work or meetings to distance themselves from the Trump administration. They must take a stand against him.

It is clear that Trump and Putin appear to crave chaos, and no rational individual can support Musk's public policies. This is our moment for united action!

Collectively, boycotting pro-Russian companies and their products can send a resounding message and demand accountability.

The staggering losses among both Russian and North Korean troops—reportedly around 1,000 casualties each day—tell a different story than the one propagated by fake news and Trump-Putin narratives suggesting Russian dominance in the war.

In reality, Ukraine has been the frontrunner for an extended period, while Russia has barely progressed a mere hundred meters in recent months. At this rate, it would take Russia 35 years to conquer Ukraine.

Each incremental gain for Russia comes at a steep cost, with thousands of soldiers wounded or killed. This begs the question: for what purpose? Without a massive increase in troop deployment to hold and secure Ukraine's cities, Russia cannot sustain its presence. Putin is grappling with an unprecedented crisis, as entire regiments are abandoning his side.

Now is the crucial moment for Ukraine to launch a counter-offensive against Russian forces. With a ceasefire on the horizon, it is essential for Ukraine to regroup and prepare for a renewed offensive. Putin’s intention to escalate the conflict mirrors the troubling agreements seen between Netanyahu and Trump regarding Gaza and likely undermines any chance of a genuine ceasefire.

Reports indicate that reservists in Russia are fleeing in droves, alarmed by the high casualty rates among Russian soldiers—many of whom are losing their lives or facing severe injuries.

Despite this, Trump continuously champions Putin, suggesting that the Russian leader could have taken Kyiv in just five hours. Yet, we witnessed that failed attempt in 2022—so where is Trump getting his information? Does he really think his supporters buy into this Russian propaganda?

The rush for international flights out of Russia has surged, with seats disappearing rapidly following Putin's announcement of reservist mobilization. Flight prices have soared as available routes are fully booked. Approximately 200 flights daily are operating from Moscow and St. Petersburg to various global destinations, with Turkey leading the count at 70 flights a day.

This chaos presents a unique opportunity. Russia holds a weak hand in any potential negotiations for a ceasefire. For years to come, bombs and drones will target not only Russian generals but also the political elite, both within Russia and Ukraine.

Interestingly, Ukraine could have launched an offensive on Moscow as well. The reality is that only Trump stands as a potential savior for Russia. Putin is increasingly desperate for a respite to recover and regroup, aiming to extract financial gains from Trump and the U.S. before considering another, potentially more successful, attack on Ukraine.

In a troubling twist, Trump appears determined to siphon as much money as possible from the U.S. to funnel it to Putin. His threat of sanctions is merely a façade, a public relations stunt aimed at giving the illusion of exerting pressure on Russia to reach a peace deal.